The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell diseases, characterized by abnormal bone marrow differentiation and maturation, as well as impaired apoptosis. The basis is genetic, and the median age is 65–70 years. Anemia occurs in 90% of the patients and pancytopenia in 50% of them. About 20-60% of MDS patients transform into acute leukemia.
MDS treatment depends on the status of the disease, i.e. lower or higher-risk according to the IPSS/R classification, as well as patient individual factors, including age, co-morbidities and functional capacity. As a general rule of thumb, one can conclude that most therapies are effective in about 50% of the patients and response duration is about 2 years, leaving some challenges for the future.
Treatment in LR-MDS: RBC transfusions remain the common approach for anemia. Given the little evidence, the ELN-EU MDS guidelines suggest individualized approach. After 3 decades of successful use, erythroid stimulating agents (ESA) have become the standard 1st line agents, with 50% response rate. Lenalidomide was found to be effective (56%) and safe in del(5q) patients, while only 27% of MDS patients with non-del(5q) benefit from this agent.
Several promising agents are tested as possible treatments after ESA failure, or maybe together with ESA. Here, we will mention luspatercept (activing analogue), low dose or oral hypomethylating agents, roxadustat (HIF inhibitor) and imetelstat (telomerase inhibitor).
Treatment of thrombocytopenia: Surprisingly, there is no evidence to support platelet transfusions, thus the ELN-EU MDS guidelines recommend such an approach only in active bleeding events. Both thrombomimetics, romiplostim and eltrombopag, have been proven to be effective, but safety concerns inhibit their development into clinical practice.
Treatment of HR MDS: It has been more than a decade that hypomethylating agents (HMA) have become the standard 1st line treatment in HR MDS. However, we are still struggling to overcome the barrier of 50% response rate for 2 years. Attempts to improve have included, HMA switch, different dosing, new derivatives, identification of responding subgroups, and a better supportive care, with limited success. Several HMA-based combinations with lenalidomde, vorinostat and other agents have yielded higher response rate but with no survival advantage. Venetoclax might become the best partner to Aza, but it is still too early to conclude. Among the novel agents under trials we will discuss rigosertib (Ras inhibitor), pevonedistat (NEDD8 inhibitoe), glasdegib (Hedgehog inhibitor), selinexor (EXPO inhibitor), and MBG 453 (anti TIM 3).
All these agents and clinical trials, together with new approaches such as immunotherapy, will hopefully, improve the outcome of MDS patients in the coming years.